lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:03:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: kan.liang@...el.com Cc: hannes@...essinduktion.org, andi@...stfloor.org, fw@...len.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@...nvz.org, john.stultz@...aro.org, aduyck@...antis.com, ben@...adent.org.uk, decot@...glers.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 01:49:41 +0000 > Yes, rtnl will bring some overheads. But the configuration is one > time thing for application or socket. It only happens on receiving > first packet. Thanks for destroying our connection rates. This kind of overhead is simply unacceptable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists