[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACSApvYj5X166euM2Qy+ubvLYdfYg65itMYiVeTf5SUuiA+gog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:34:20 -0400
From: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, daniel@...earbox.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, ast@...mgrid.com,
tklauser@...tanz.ch, fruggeri@...stanetworks.com,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] packet: fix second argument of sock_tx_timestamp()
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com> wrote:
> This patch fixes an issue that a syscall (e.g. sendto syscall) cannot
> work correctly. Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
> the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot work correctly because
> the socks.tsflags is set to 0.
> So, this patch sets the socks.tsflags to sk->sk_tsflags as default.
>
> Fixes: c14ac9451c34 ("sock: enable timestamping using control messages")
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com>
> Reported-by: Keita Kobayashi <keita.kobayashi.ym@...esas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
> ---
> Changes from v2:
> - Fix build error...
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Set socks.tsflags to sk->sk_tsflags as default instead of a condition.
> - Fix other socks.tsflags values in the af_packet.c.
> - Revise the commit log.
>
> About v1 (as RFC):
> - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.renesas-soc/5646
>
> net/packet/af_packet.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index 9f0983f..53e87ce 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ retry:
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - sockc.tsflags = 0;
> + sockc.tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags;
> if (msg->msg_controllen) {
> err = sock_cmsg_send(sk, msg, &sockc);
> if (unlikely(err)) {
> @@ -2678,7 +2678,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
> dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(&po->sk), saddr->sll_ifindex);
> }
>
> - sockc.tsflags = 0;
> + sockc.tsflags = po->sk.sk_tsflags;
> if (msg->msg_controllen) {
> err = sock_cmsg_send(&po->sk, msg, &sockc);
> if (unlikely(err))
> @@ -2881,7 +2881,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> if (unlikely(!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - sockc.tsflags = 0;
> + sockc.tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags;
> sockc.mark = sk->sk_mark;
> if (msg->msg_controllen) {
> err = sock_cmsg_send(sk, msg, &sockc);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Thanks for the fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists