netdev - Re: [PATCH v10 05/12] net/mlx4_en: add support for fast rx drop bpf program

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <578F3F6D.5000903@iogearbox.net>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:07:57 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
	Ari Saha <as754m@....com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>, john.fastabend@...il.com,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/12] net/mlx4_en: add support for fast rx drop bpf
 program

On 07/19/2016 09:16 PM, Brenden Blanco wrote:
> Add support for the BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP hook in mlx4 driver.
>
> In tc/socket bpf programs, helpers linearize skb fragments as needed
> when the program touches the packet data. However, in the pursuit of
> speed, XDP programs will not be allowed to use these slower functions,
> especially if it involves allocating an skb.
>
> Therefore, disallow MTU settings that would produce a multi-fragment
> packet that XDP programs would fail to access. Future enhancements could
> be done to increase the allowable MTU.
>
> The xdp program is present as a per-ring data structure, but as of yet
> it is not possible to set at that granularity through any ndo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>
[...]
>   struct mlx4_en_bond {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> index c1b3a9c..6729545 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>    */
>
>   #include <net/busy_poll.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
>   #include <linux/mlx4/cq.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/mlx4/qp.h>
> @@ -509,6 +510,8 @@ void mlx4_en_destroy_rx_ring(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
>   	struct mlx4_en_dev *mdev = priv->mdev;
>   	struct mlx4_en_rx_ring *ring = *pring;
>
> +	if (ring->xdp_prog)
> +		bpf_prog_put(ring->xdp_prog);

Would be good if you also make this a READ_ONCE() here. I believe this is the
only other spot in your set that has this 'direct' access (besides xchg() and
READ_ONCE() from mlx4_en_process_rx_cq()). It would be mostly for consistency
and to indicate that there's a more complex synchronization behind it. I'm mostly
worried that if it's not consistently used, people might copy this and not use
the READ_ONCE() also in other spots where it matters, and thus add hard to find
bugs.

>   	mlx4_free_hwq_res(mdev->dev, &ring->wqres, size * stride + TXBB_SIZE);
>   	vfree(ring->rx_info);
>   	ring->rx_info = NULL;
> @@ -743,6 +746,7 @@ int mlx4_en_process_rx_cq(struct net_device *dev, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq, int bud
>   	struct mlx4_en_rx_ring *ring = priv->rx_ring[cq->ring];
>   	struct mlx4_en_rx_alloc *frags;
>   	struct mlx4_en_rx_desc *rx_desc;
> +	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
>   	struct sk_buff *skb;
>   	int index;
>   	int nr;
> @@ -759,6 +763,8 @@ int mlx4_en_process_rx_cq(struct net_device *dev, struct mlx4_en_cq *cq, int bud
>   	if (budget <= 0)
>   		return polled;