[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160721170100.GA11613@salvia>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:01:00 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: fgao@...ai8.com
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gfree.wind@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL instead of IS_ERR and
NULl check to simplify the codes in ip_vs_genl_dump_dests and
resolve_normal_ct
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:45:53PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > index 153e33f..634d592 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> > @@ -1108,10 +1108,8 @@ resolve_normal_ct(struct net *net, struct nf_conn *tmpl,
> > if (!h) {
> > h = init_conntrack(net, tmpl, &tuple, l3proto, l4proto,
> > skb, dataoff, hash);
> > - if (!h)
> > - return NULL;
> > - if (IS_ERR(h))
> > - return (void *)h;
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(h))
> > + return ERR_CAST(h);
>
> Interesting.
>
> I think we can actually simplify this patch, I'm sending a patch for
> this now.
Forget this, I cannot actually achieve the simplification, we need the
ENOMEM to drop packets when we're under stress.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists