netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160721114153.2d8fa30f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:41:53 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
	Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c

between commit:

  ec25bc04ed8e ("net/mlx4_en: Add resilience in low memory systems")

from the net tree and commit:

  9ecc2d86171a ("net/mlx4_en: add xdp forwarding and data write support")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
index 44cf16d01f42,f32e272c83dd..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
@@@ -1730,28 -1722,32 +1729,35 @@@ static int mlx4_en_set_channels(struct 
  	    !channel->tx_count || !channel->rx_count)
  		return -EINVAL;
  
+ 	if (channel->tx_count * MLX4_EN_NUM_UP <= priv->xdp_ring_num) {
+ 		en_err(priv, "Minimum %d tx channels required with XDP on\n",
+ 		       priv->xdp_ring_num / MLX4_EN_NUM_UP + 1);
+ 		return -EINVAL;
+ 	}
+ 
 +	tmp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
 +	if (!tmp)
 +		return -ENOMEM;
 +
  	mutex_lock(&mdev->state_lock);
 +	memcpy(&new_prof, priv->prof, sizeof(struct mlx4_en_port_profile));
 +	new_prof.num_tx_rings_p_up = channel->tx_count;
 +	new_prof.tx_ring_num = channel->tx_count * MLX4_EN_NUM_UP;
 +	new_prof.rx_ring_num = channel->rx_count;
 +
 +	err = mlx4_en_try_alloc_resources(priv, tmp, &new_prof);
 +	if (err)
 +		goto out;
 +
  	if (priv->port_up) {
  		port_up = 1;
  		mlx4_en_stop_port(dev, 1);
  	}
  
 -	mlx4_en_free_resources(priv);
 -
 -	priv->num_tx_rings_p_up = channel->tx_count;
 -	priv->tx_ring_num = channel->tx_count * MLX4_EN_NUM_UP;
 -	priv->rx_ring_num = channel->rx_count;
 -
 -	err = mlx4_en_alloc_resources(priv);
 -	if (err) {
 -		en_err(priv, "Failed reallocating port resources\n");
 -		goto out;
 -	}
 +	mlx4_en_safe_replace_resources(priv, tmp);
  
- 	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, priv->tx_ring_num);
+ 	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, priv->tx_ring_num -
+ 							priv->xdp_ring_num);
  	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, priv->rx_ring_num);
  
  	if (dev->num_tc)