[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160721004307.GD22834@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 02:43:07 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: rework EEPROM access
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 06:18:35PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> The 6352 family of switches and compatibles provide a 8-bit address and
> 16-bit data access to an optional EEPROM.
>
> Newer chip such as the 6390 family slightly changed the access to 16-bit
> address and 8-bit data.
>
> This commit cleans up the EEPROM access code for 16-bit access and makes
> it easy to eventually introduce future support for 8-bit access.
>
> Here's a list of notable changes brought by this patch:
>
> - provide Global2 unlocked helpers for EEPROM commands
> - remove eeprom_mutex, only reg_lock is necessary for driver functions
> - eeprom_len is 0 for chip without EEPROM, so return it directly
> - the Running bit must be 0 before r/w, so wait for Busy *and* Running
> - remove now unused mv88e6xxx_wait and mv88e6xxx_reg_write
> - other than that, the logic (in _{get,set}_eeprom16) didn't change
>
> Chips with an 8-bit EEPROM access will require to implement the
> 8-suffixed variant of G2 helpers and the related flag:
>
> #define MV88E6XXX_FLAGS_EEPROM8 \
> (MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G2_EEPROM_CMD | \
> MV88E6XXX_FLAG_G2_EEPROM_ADDR)
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists