lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:02:53 +0300
From:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:	Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
CC:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpdma: fix lockup in
 cpdma_ctlr_destroy()

On 07/23/2016 09:24 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22.07.16 16:58, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Fix deadlock in cpdma_ctlr_destroy() which is triggered now on
>> cpsw module removal:
>>  cpsw_remove()
>>  - cpdma_ctlr_destroy()
>>    - spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags)
>>    - cpdma_ctlr_stop()
>>      - spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); <- deadlock
>>    - cpdma_chan_destroy()
>>      - spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags); <- deadlock
>>
>> The issue has not been observed before because CPDMA channels have
>> been destroyed manually by CPSW until commit d941ebe88a41 ("net:
>> ethernet: ti: cpsw: use destroy ctlr to destroy channels") was merged.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 2 --
>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
>> index a68652a..89242e9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c
>> @@ -436,7 +436,6 @@ int cpdma_ctlr_destroy(struct cpdma_ctlr *ctlr)
>>      if (!ctlr)
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>
>> -    spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags);
> Should ctlr->state be checked under lock?
> Seems like here should be used unlocked static versions of
> cpdma_ctlr_stop() and cpdma_chan_destroy() instead.

As per my understanding it's not expected the ctlr->state will be changed at this 
moment as all net devices has been unregistered already.

> 
>>      if (ctlr->state != CPDMA_STATE_IDLE)

May be I can move above check in cpdma_ctlr_stop() instead.
What do you think?

>>          cpdma_ctlr_stop(ctlr);
>>
>> @@ -444,7 +443,6 @@ int cpdma_ctlr_destroy(struct cpdma_ctlr *ctlr)
>>          cpdma_chan_destroy(ctlr->channels[i]);
>>
>>      cpdma_desc_pool_destroy(ctlr->pool);
>> -    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags);
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpdma_ctlr_destroy);
>>
> 


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ