[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160728232844.GA25372@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 01:28:44 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [e1000_netpoll] BUG: sleeping function called
from invalid context at kernel/irq/manage.c:110
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> :
[...]
> I would prefer having a definitive advice from Thomas Gleixner and/or
> others if disable_irq() is forbidden from IRQ path.
>
> As I said, about all netpoll() methods in net drivers use disable_irq()
> so a lot of patches would be needed.
s/about all/many/
There has been a WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled() in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev for
quite some time now but it's apparently screened by too many tests to be
effective. :o/
--
Ueimor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists