[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160729080402.GA13798@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:04:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Raju Lakkaraju <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rosemi.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Allan Nielsen <Allan.Nielsen@...rosemi.com>
Subject: Re: Microsemi VSC 8531/41 PHY Driver
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:44:37AM +0000, Raju Lakkaraju wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Thank you for given valuable comments.
> Please see the my responses inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Raju
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@...n.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:14 PM
> To: Raju Lakkaraju
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; f.fainelli@...il.com; Allan Nielsen
> Subject: Re: Microsemi VSC 8531/41 PHY Driver
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
>
> > +/* RGMII Rx Clock delay value change with board lay-out */ static u8
> > +rgmii_rx_clk_delay = RGMII_RX_CLK_DELAY_1_1_NS;
>
> Doesn't this stop you from having a board with two PHYs with different layouts? You should be getting this value from the device tree.
>
> Raju: As of now, RGMII Rx clock delay value should be 1.1 nsec as optimized/recommended value.
> We tested on Beaglebone Black with VSC 8531 PHY.
> We would like to provide new function to configure correct/require value based on PHY layouts
> alone with other RGMII configuration parameters as part of our next implementation.
Hi Raju
Please can you use standard email quoting, just like everybody else does.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists