[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160730.220703.417829793602387422.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 22:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com, vyasevich@...il.com,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: allow delivering notifications after
receiving SHUTDOWN
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 14:09:09 +0800
> Prior to this patch, once sctp received SHUTDOWN or shutdown with RD,
> sk->sk_shutdown would be set with RCV_SHUTDOWN, and all events would
> be dropped in sctp_ulpq_tail_event(). It would cause:
>
> 1. some notifications couldn't be received by users. like
> SCTP_SHUTDOWN_COMP generated by sctp_sf_do_4_C().
>
> 2. sctp would also never trigger sk_data_ready when the association
> was closed, making it harder to identify the end of the association
> by calling recvmsg() and getting an EOF. It was not convenient for
> kernel users.
>
> The check here should be stopping delivering DATA chunks after receiving
> SHUTDOWN, and stopping delivering ANY chunks after sctp_close().
>
> So this patch is to allow notifications to enqueue into receive queue
> even if sk->sk_shutdown is set to RCV_SHUTDOWN in sctp_ulpq_tail_event,
> but if sk->sk_shutdown == RCV_SHUTDOWN | SEND_SHUTDOWN, it drops all
> events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists