[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HE1PR04MB14502FECE11A0ACF0A1ED0E08B040@HE1PR04MB1450.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:19:19 +0000
From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"vbridger@...nsource.altera.com" <vbridger@...nsource.altera.com>,
"isubramanian@....com" <isubramanian@....com>,
"kchudgar@....com" <kchudgar@....com>,
"yisen.zhuang@...wei.com" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"salil.mehta@...wei.com" <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com"
<thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com"
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...com" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"mugunthanvnm@...com" <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
"tremyfr@...il.com" <tremyfr@...il.com>,
"wxt@...k-chips.com" <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"david.daney@...ium.com" <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"huangdaode@...ilicon.com" <huangdaode@...ilicon.com>,
"jszhang@...vell.com" <jszhang@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/15] ethernet: aurora: nb8800: add missing of_node_put
after calling of_parse_phandle
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> index 0d4ea92..d15d96b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c
>> @@ -1006,6 +1006,7 @@ static int nb8800_stop(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> netif_stop_queue(dev);
>> napi_disable(&priv->napi);
>> + of_node_put(priv->phy_node);
>>
>> nb8800_dma_stop(dev);
>> nb8800_mac_rx(dev, false);
>
>This is broken. The priv->phy_node reference is taken in the probe function,
>therefore you have to drop that reference in the "remove" function not the "stop"
>function.
>
>I'm just looking over basic details of this patch series, and along with some other
>feedback you've received, it looks like you really didn't put a lot of auditing into the
>changes you are making.
>
>Please go over this series one more time and resubmit the entire thing after
>everything is sorted out and double-checked.
>
Thanks for your comments, David. I do not familiar with Ethernet driver, and thought
if the node is used up, it can be freed like other drivers. But for phy_node, it will be
used in whole driver's life cycle, it is my careless. I will review each patch in this series
again.
Best regards,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists