netdev - RE: [PATCH -next] qed: Use DEFINE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CO2PR11MB0088C022197DB1FCEAD4784F97050@CO2PR11MB0088.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:04:00 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To:	Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ariel Elior <Ariel.Elior@...gic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] qed: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for spinlock

> spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK() rather than
> explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@...il.com>

Seems reasonable, although afaik net-next is still closed.
Thanks.

Acked-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>