[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802114807.3566-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:48:07 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: pizza@...ftnet.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org, linuxwifi@...el.com,
m.chehab@...sung.com, pawel@...iak.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0804/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/sta.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/sta.c
index daf06a4..fad0c81 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/sta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/sta.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void cw1200_stop(struct ieee80211_hw *dev)
}
static int cw1200_bssloss_mitigation = 1;
-module_param(cw1200_bssloss_mitigation, int, 0644);
+module_param(cw1200_bssloss_mitigation, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(cw1200_bssloss_mitigation, "BSS Loss mitigation. 0 == disabled, 1 == enabled (default)");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists