netdev - [PATCH 0718/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160802113936.29929-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date:	Tue,  2 Aug 2016 19:39:36 +0800
From:	Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To:	tlfalcon@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	m.chehab@...sung.com, pawel@...iak.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
	baolex.ni@...el.com, fw@...len.de, davem@...emloft.net,
	Baohua.Song@....com
Subject: [PATCH 0718/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
index ebe6071..7b0fd24 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmveth.c
@@ -66,17 +66,17 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_VERSION(ibmveth_driver_version);
 
 static unsigned int tx_copybreak __read_mostly = 128;
-module_param(tx_copybreak, uint, 0644);
+module_param(tx_copybreak, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(tx_copybreak,
 	"Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on transmit");
 
 static unsigned int rx_copybreak __read_mostly = 128;
-module_param(rx_copybreak, uint, 0644);
+module_param(rx_copybreak, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_copybreak,
 	"Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on receive");
 
 static unsigned int rx_flush __read_mostly = 0;
-module_param(rx_flush, uint, 0644);
+module_param(rx_flush, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_flush, "Flush receive buffers before use");
 
 static bool old_large_send __read_mostly;
@@ -1730,9 +1730,9 @@ static ssize_t veth_pool_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
 	.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = _mode,	\
 	};
 
-static ATTR(active, 0644);
-static ATTR(num, 0644);
-static ATTR(size, 0644);
+static ATTR(active, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+static ATTR(num, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+static ATTR(size, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 
 static struct attribute *veth_pool_attrs[] = {
 	&veth_active_attr,
-- 
2.9.2