lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802113855.29454-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date:	Tue,  2 Aug 2016 19:38:55 +0800
From:	Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To:	derek.chickles@...iumnetworks.com,
	satananda.burla@...iumnetworks.com,
	felix.manlunas@...iumnetworks.com,
	raghu.vatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com, computersforpeace@...il.com,
	m.chehab@...sung.com, pawel@...iak.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, hdegoede@...hat.com,
	mugunthanvnm@...com, felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com, fw@...len.de
Subject: [PATCH 0711/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c
index 8de79ae..35837ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c
@@ -61,19 +61,19 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE(LIO_FW_DIR LIO_FW_BASE_NAME LIO_210NV_NAME LIO_FW_NAME_SUFFIX);
 MODULE_FIRMWARE(LIO_FW_DIR LIO_FW_BASE_NAME LIO_410NV_NAME LIO_FW_NAME_SUFFIX);
 
 static int ddr_timeout = 10000;
-module_param(ddr_timeout, int, 0644);
+module_param(ddr_timeout, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(ddr_timeout,
 		 "Number of milliseconds to wait for DDR initialization. 0 waits for ddr_timeout to be set to non-zero value before starting to check");
 
 static u32 console_bitmask;
-module_param(console_bitmask, int, 0644);
+module_param(console_bitmask, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(console_bitmask,
 		 "Bitmask indicating which consoles have debug output redirected to syslog.");
 
 #define DEFAULT_MSG_ENABLE (NETIF_MSG_DRV | NETIF_MSG_PROBE | NETIF_MSG_LINK)
 
 static int debug = -1;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "NETIF_MSG debug bits");
 
 static char fw_type[LIO_MAX_FW_TYPE_LEN];
-- 
2.9.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ