[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802121926.25783-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:19:26 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH 1135/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
net/sctp/protocol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index d3d50da..a36f2e2 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -1597,6 +1597,6 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("net-pf-" __stringify(PF_INET) "-proto-132");
MODULE_ALIAS("net-pf-" __stringify(PF_INET6) "-proto-132");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Linux Kernel SCTP developers <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Support for the SCTP protocol (RFC2960)");
-module_param_named(no_checksums, sctp_checksum_disable, bool, 0644);
+module_param_named(no_checksums, sctp_checksum_disable, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_checksums, "Disable checksums computing and verification");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists