[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57A26106.50206@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 16:24:22 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org,
shankerd@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, gavidov@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
andrew@...n.ch, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mlangsdo@...hat.com,
jcm@...hat.com, agross@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net,
f.fainelli@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v6] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> As I said, this is inherently driver specific. If setting the 64-bit
> mask fails, the driver itself needs to fall back to the 32-bit mask
> so it can allocate buffers from ZONE_DMA instead of ZONE_NORMAL.
I just posted a v7 of my patch, but I forgot to fix the dma_set_mask
call. I'll post a v8 soon, but before I do, what do you think of this:
/* The EMAC itself is capable of 64-bit DMA, so try that first. */
ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
if (ret) {
/* Some platforms may restrict the EMAC's address bus to less
* then the size of DDR. In this case, we need to try a
* smaller mask. We could try every possible smaller mask,
* but that's overkill. Instead, just fall to 32-bit, which
* should always work.
*/
ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not set DMA mask\n");
return ret;
}
}
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists