netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] liquidio support for new device cn23xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160803.150504.2220219685584839824.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] liquidio support for new device cn23xx

From: Raghu Vatsavayi <rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:55:31 -0700

> Please consider following patches for support of new device
> CN23XX in liquidio family of adapters. Patches may have to
> be applied in following order as some of the patches depend
> on earlier patches.

You can't have the same Subject line text for every patch in the
series.

It is required that you use unique subject lines so that someone
scanning the shortlog can see what is unique in each of these patches.

And don't try to thward this by saying something like:

	liquidio support for new device cn23xx part 1

Really describe in words what each change is uniquely doing.