[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb69b031-53ad-4649-bd1d-e95ca7a0cc70@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 11:51:09 +0900
From: Masashi Honma <masashi.honma@...il.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Yaniv Machani <yanivma@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Meirav Kama <meiravk@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mac80211: mesh: fixed HT ies in beacon template
On 2016年08月02日 16:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
> This explicitly configures *HT capability* though - that's even the
> name of the parameter. If you enable HT40 in the capability, the
> resulting BSS might still not actually *use* 40 MHz bandwidth, as
> required by overlapping BSS detection.
OK, I see.
HT Capabilities element = Defined by hardware and software spec of the
node. So it does not be modified after boot.
HT Operation element = Defined by surrounding environment and
configuration of the node. So it could be modified after boot.
So, if the node supports HT40, HT Capabilities shows HT40 is capable.
Now, I understand why you rejected this patch.
But now, when disable_ht=1, no HT Capabilities element in beacon even
though the node supports HT.
My trailing patch could solve the issue.
Masashi Honma.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists