[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57A3870F.8020203@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:18:55 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, sdharia@...eaurora.org,
shankerd@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, gavidov@...eaurora.org, andrew@...n.ch,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mlangsdo@...hat.com, jcm@...hat.com,
agross@...eaurora.org, davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
LinoSanfilippo@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v7] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver
Rob Herring wrote:
>> >+- phy-version : the version of the integrated emac phy, either 1 or 2.
> Sounds like 2 different h/w. The compatible property should distinguish
> this.
Well, the MAC parts of the EMAC is the same. I could do
qcom,fsm9900-emac for v1 and qcom,qdf2432-emac for v2. I can't really
think of a reason why that wouldn't work.
For ACPI, we can assume that QCOM8070 is a v2 PHY. If Qualcomm creates
another server chip with a v1 PHY, it would need a new ACPI HID.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists