[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1470345272-874-3-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 00:14:31 +0300
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mugunthanvnm@...com
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove redundant check in napi poll
No need to check number of handled packets, when in most cases (> 99%)
it's not 0. It can be 0 only in rarely cases, even in this case
it's not bad to print just 0.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 8972bf6..85ee9f5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -793,9 +793,7 @@ static int cpsw_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget)
}
}
- if (num_tx)
- cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx);
-
+ cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d tx pkts\n", num_tx);
return num_tx;
}
@@ -814,9 +812,7 @@ static int cpsw_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget)
}
}
- if (num_rx)
- cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx);
-
+ cpsw_dbg(priv, intr, "poll %d rx pkts\n", num_rx);
return num_rx;
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists