[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b2f2b26-ad21-031c-800b-e894c508713b@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:11:19 +0900
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix problems around fdb entries pointing to
the bridge device
On 2016/08/04 17:15, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> On 2016/08/04 16:24, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> On 8/3/16, 7:11 PM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> Adding fdb entries pointing to the bridge device uses fdb_insert(),
>>> which lacks various checks and does not respect added_by_user flag.
>>>
>>> As a result, some inconsistent behavior can happen:
>>> * Adding temporary entries succeeds but results in permanent entries.
>>
>> IIRC this is not specific to fdb entries on the bridge device. all temp
>> fdb entries via iproute2 result in permanent entries. thats why 'dynamic'
>> was added.
>
> Sorry for confusing you, I meant "temp" (i.e., "static") of bridge fdb
> command.
> "temp", "dynamic" and "use" should not result in "permanent".
I probably misread you in my previous reply so the previous answer looks
weird...
What I should have said is:
Other temp fdb entries via iproute2 result in static (== temp), not
permanent.
"dynamic" and "use" should be meant for dynamic entries, not static (temp).
--
Toshiaki Makita
Powered by blists - more mailing lists