lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:11:19 +0900
From:	Toshiaki Makita <>
To:	Roopa Prabhu <>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <>,
	Stephen Hemminger <>,,,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: Fix problems around fdb entries pointing to
 the bridge device

On 2016/08/04 17:15, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> On 2016/08/04 16:24, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> On 8/3/16, 7:11 PM, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> Adding fdb entries pointing to the bridge device uses fdb_insert(),
>>> which lacks various checks and does not respect added_by_user flag.
>>> As a result, some inconsistent behavior can happen:
>>> * Adding temporary entries succeeds but results in permanent entries.
>> IIRC this is not specific to fdb entries on the bridge device. all temp
>> fdb entries via iproute2 result in permanent entries. thats why 'dynamic'
>> was added.
> Sorry for confusing you, I meant "temp" (i.e., "static") of bridge fdb
> command.
> "temp", "dynamic" and "use" should not result in "permanent".

I probably misread you in my previous reply so the previous answer looks

What I should have said is:
Other temp fdb entries via iproute2 result in static (== temp), not
"dynamic" and "use" should be meant for dynamic entries, not static (temp).

Toshiaki Makita

Powered by blists - more mailing lists