netdev - Re: [PATCH] bonding: Allow tun-interfaces as slaves

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160809.121010.539583047008259861.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joern@...estorage.com
Cc:	jay.vosburgh@...onical.com, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: Allow tun-interfaces as slaves

From: Jörn Engel <joern@...estorage.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:40:57 -0700

> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:21:31AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> 	The balance-rr mode (as well as the -xor mode) is designed to
>> interoperate with a Cisco Etherchannel-style static link aggregation,
>> which requires all members to have the same MAC address for proper
>> function.
> 
> Linux was designed to be a terminal for dialup to a university in
> Helsinki, if memory serves.  Sometimes it is a good thing to work in
> ways the design never intended.

You're not addressing the issue Jay is trying to make you aware of
in a useful way.

You state that Jay doesn't want to help you, but your comment here
shows that you really aren't exactly participating in the most
positive manner either.