[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAedzxq-XYTVgZ7=VX-OWHYNSRjDuf==si-my=Jy3YEo7atcWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:01:04 +0900
From: Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
吉藤英明 <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: Fix ping to link-local addresses.
On 9 August 2016 at 14:20, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:00:25 +0900
>
>> Note that pretty much every sendmsg codepath allows other data to take
>> precedence over sk_bound_dev_if:
>>
>> - udpv6_sendmsg: if sin6_scope_id specified on a scoped address
>> - rawv6_sendmsg: if sin6_scope_id specified on a scoped address
>> - l2tp_ip6_sendmsg: if sin6_scope_id specified on a scoped address
>> - ip_cmsg_send: if IP_PKTINFO or IPV6_PKTINFO specified
>>
>> What should I do about those? -EINVAL? Ignore the conflicting data? Leave as is?
>
> That's a good point, I guess this needs some more thought.
I could see a point of view that says when bound_if is in play sending
to destinations on/via other interfaces--by any mechanism--should
effectively get ENETUNREACH (or something).
That does seem like I would involve changing some existing behavior, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists