[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D5F50D107@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:34:05 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Stephen Hemminger' <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>,
"eladr@...lanox.com" <eladr@...lanox.com>,
"yotamg@...lanox.com" <yotamg@...lanox.com>,
"nogahf@...lanox.com" <nogahf@...lanox.com>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [patch iproute2 1/2] devlink: write usage help messages to
stderr
From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: 08 August 2016 16:57
> To: Jiri Pirko
...
> > >> In order to not confuse reader, write help messages into stderr.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> > >
> > >This does make devlink consistent with other parts of iproute2.
> > >But the most common coding standards, back to Unix, and GNU are
> > >that help messages should go to stdout so that:
> > > $ ip -h | more
> > >would work as expected.
> >
> > The thing is I wanted to make stdout only for json. Putting non-json
> > help out there does not look correct to me. Is it?
> >
>
> I applied both of these patches, just wanted to mention that iproute2 is not
> following the GNU convention. At this point, it really doesn't matter, there
> are arguments to be made for both behaviors.
If you output help in response to an invalid option (eg) 'ip -?' then you
need to write it to stderr since it is part of the error message.
OTOH if help is explicitly requested 'ip -h' then stdout would be ok.
Nothing wrong with typing 'ip -h 2>&1 | pg' though.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists