lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:09:53 +0200
From:	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel\@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/4] hv_netvsc: reset vf_inject on VF removal

Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com> writes:

>> +static void netvsc_inject_enable(struct net_device_context
>> +*net_device_ctx) {
>> +	net_device_ctx->vf_inject = true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void netvsc_inject_disable(struct net_device_context
>> +*net_device_ctx) {
>> +	net_device_ctx->vf_inject = false;
>> +
>> +	/* Wait for currently active users to drain out. */
>> +	while (atomic_read(&net_device_ctx->vf_use_cnt) != 0)
>> +		udelay(50);
>> +}
>
> That was already the behavior before, but are you certain you
> want to unconditionally block without any possible timeout?

Yes, this is OK. After PATCH4 of this series there is only one place
which takes the vf_use_cnt (netvsc_recv_callback()) and it is an
interrupt handler, there are no sleepable operations there.

-- 
  Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ