netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] bpf: Add bpf_current_task_under

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:28:41 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] bpf: Add bpf_current_task_under_cgroup
 helper

Hello, Alexei.

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 08:21:21AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > lol I should have read the whole thread before replying twice.  Sorry
> > about that.  Yeah, if we can still rename it, let's do "under".  It's
> > more intuitive and gives us the room to implement the real "in" test
> > if ever necessary in the future.
> 
> agree. Thanks for explaining 'in' vs 'under' terminology.
> since we can still rename skb_in_cgroup we should do it.

Sounds good to me.

> and since that was my only nit for this patch.
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

FWIW,

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

> All 3 patches should go via net-next and to avoid conflicts 1/3 can be
> in cgroup tree as well (if you think there will be conflicts).
> We did that in the past with tip and net-next and it worked out well.

Yeah, just route it through net-next.  If other changes ever need it,
I'll include the commit in cgroup tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun