[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3LNv+hDm0HfxYiGvotiTYab9W-+5R0OUjinF-tdwKy1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 00:45:16 +0900
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>, Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: Fix ping to link-local addresses.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:44 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
<hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com> wrote:
>
> >> I could see a point of view that says when bound_if is in play sending
> >> to destinations on/via other interfaces--by any mechanism--should
> >> effectively get ENETUNREACH (or something).
> >
> > VRF uses this capability to send on an enslaved interface. ie., socket is bound to VRF device to limit packets to that L3 domain and then uses PKTINFO to force a packet out a particular interface.
>
> We could extend our code to allow enslave devices, maybe.
So something like this, then?
static inline bool inet_check_bound_oif(const struct sock *sk, int oif)
{
if (!oif || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if || oif == sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
return true;
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_L3_MASTER_DEV
return l3mdev_master_ifindex_by_index(sock_net(sk), oif) ==
sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
#endif
return false;
}
and then in the various sendmsg functions:
if (!inet_check_bound_oif(sk, oif))
return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists