[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57B139E6.8080702@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:41:26 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tools lib bpf: export function to set type
On 2016/8/13 20:17, Eric Leblond wrote:
> Current API was not allowing the user to set a type like socket
> filter. To avoid a setter function for each type, the patch simply
> exports a set function that takes the type in parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 15 ++++++---------
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 7872ff6..ff2a8c6 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -1336,26 +1336,23 @@ int bpf_program__nth_fd(struct bpf_program *prog, int n)
> return fd;
> }
>
> -static void bpf_program__set_type(struct bpf_program *prog,
> +int bpf_program__set_type(struct bpf_program *prog,
> enum bpf_prog_type type)
> {
> + if (!prog)
> + return -EINVAL;
> prog->type = type;
> + return 0;
> }
>
We'd better add a sanity check here to prevent setting invalid
program type. Plase have a look at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/17/13
> int bpf_program__set_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog)
> {
> - if (!prog)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT);
> - return 0;
> + return bpf_program__set_type(prog, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT);
> }
>
> int bpf_program__set_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog)
> {
> - if (!prog)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - bpf_program__set_type(prog, BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE);
> - return 0;
> + return bpf_program__set_type(prog, BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE);
> }
>
> static bool bpf_program__is_type(struct bpf_program *prog,
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index a6c5cde..6a84d7a 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ int bpf_program__set_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog);
> bool bpf_program__is_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog);
> bool bpf_program__is_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog);
>
> +int bpf_program__set_type(struct bpf_program *prog,
> + enum bpf_prog_type type);
> +
This makes libbpf.h depend on kernel's uapi/linux/bpf.h.
Although I did this in the above patch, I don't like this
dependency. This is the reason why I introduce
int bpf_program__set_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog);
int bpf_program__set_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog);
bool bpf_program__is_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog);
bool bpf_program__is_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog);
and hide bpf_program__set_type inside the .c file.
Please add type setting functions, or pass int value to
bpf_program__set_type and add sanity checking.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists