[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160815071121.GA2024@nanopsycho>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:11:22 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Oded Shanoon <odeds@...lanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirva@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net/sched: cls_flower, act_mirred: VXLAN
redirect using TC
Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 07:53:30PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me> wrote:
>> tc qdisc add dev $ETH ingress
>>
>> # ENCAP rule for ARP
>> tc filter add dev $ETH protocol 0x806 parent ffff: prio 11 \
>> flower \
>> action mirred egress redirect dev $VXLAN enc_src_ip 11.11.0.1 enc_dst_ip 11.11.0.2 enc_key_id 11 enc_dst_port 4789
>>
>> # ENCAP rule for ICMP
>> tc filter add dev $ETH protocol ip parent ffff: prio 10 \
>> flower ip_proto 1 \
>> action mirred egress redirect dev $VXLAN enc_src_ip 11.11.0.1 enc_dst_ip 11.11.0.2 enc_key_id 11 enc_dst_port 4789
>>
>
>I don't like this. This makes mirred action unnecessarily
>complex, it should really just mirror or redirect packets as
>it is, why it should be aware of tunnel information?
>
>I think you probably need to introduce a new tc action
>for these tunnel information and pipe it to mirred.
that is the first thing that I thinked of when I saw the patch. I think
you can introduce act_vxlan similar to act_vlan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists