[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1471525926-20384-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:12:04 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] wireless: Use complete() instead complete_all()
From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Hi,
Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there
might be more than one reader. For -rt I am reviewing all
complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the
tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be
uses inside IRQ context and that can lead to unbounded amount work
inside the interrupt handler. That is a no no for -rt.
The patches grouped per subsystem and in small batches to allow
reviewing.
This series ignores all complete_all() usages in the firmware loading
path. They will be hopefully address by Luis' sysdata patches [0].
That leaves a couple of complete_all() calls.
The first patch fixes a real glitch for the carl9170 driver. I was
able to test it because I have the hardware. For the second one I
haven't found any dongle with that chip in my drawers.
This series against net-next of today.
cheers,
daniel
[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466117661-22075-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org
Daniel Wagner (2):
carl9170: Fix wrong completion usage
ath10k: use complete() instead complete_all()
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/usb.c | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists