netdev - [PATCH] net/irda: remove pointless assignment/check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160819160857.32254-1-vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:08:57 +0200
From:   Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
To:     Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     irda-users@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/irda: remove pointless assignment/check

We've already set sk to sock->sk and dereferenced it, so if it's NULL
we would have crashed already. Moreover, if it was NULL we would have
crashed anyway when jumping to 'out' and trying to unlock the sock.
Furthermore, if we had assigned a different value to 'sk' we would
have been calling lock_sock() and release_sock() on different sockets.

My conclusion is that these two lines are complete nonsense and only
serve to confuse the reader.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
---
 net/irda/af_irda.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/irda/af_irda.c b/net/irda/af_irda.c
index 8d2f7c9..db63969 100644
--- a/net/irda/af_irda.c
+++ b/net/irda/af_irda.c
@@ -845,9 +845,6 @@ static int irda_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
 	if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED)
 		goto out;

-	if ((sk = sock->sk) == NULL)
-		goto out;
-
 	err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	if ((sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) && (sk->sk_type != SOCK_SEQPACKET) &&
 	    (sk->sk_type != SOCK_DGRAM))
-- 
2.10.0.rc0.1.g07c9292