netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add eBPF hooks for cgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160819163755.GE29430@pox.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:37:55 +0200
From:   Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>, htejun@...com, ast@...com,
        davem@...emloft.net, kafai@...com, fw@...len.de, harald@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add eBPF hooks for cgroups

On 08/19/16 at 06:31pm, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Why do you need global seccomp policies? The process knows better what
> he needs to place in his sandbox, so attaching this from the process
> itself makes more sense to me... Anyway, this reminds me to selinux.

Two different objectives. The point is to sandbox applications and
restrict their capabilities. It's not the application itself but the task
orchestration system around it that manages the policies.