netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ipv6: fixup RTF_* flags when restoring RTPROT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <689653c8-bc05-705c-04d6-ff7570b28dd0@cogentembedded.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:07:25 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ipv6: fixup RTF_* flags when restoring RTPROT_RA
 route from rtnetlink

Hello.

On 08/19/2016 07:41 PM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:

> Fix the flags for RA-derived routes that were saved
> via "ip -6 route save" and and subsequently restored via
> "ip -6 route restore", allowing the incoming router advertisements
> to update them, rather than complain about inability to do so.
>
> Upon the restore of RA-derived saved routes, set the RTF_ADDRCONF
> to indicate that the source of the route was originally
> a router advertisement, and set the RTF_DEFAULT or RTF_ROUTEINFO
> flag depending on prefix length. This can be considered a
> sister change of f0396f60d7c165018c9b203fb9b89fb224835578, in

    It's enough to specify 12 digits but you also need to specify the commit 
summary enclosed in ("").

> the other direction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1 [1]:
>  * fixed the indentation of the basic blocks to be always a full TAB
>    as per David Miller's review
>
> [1] v1: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=147135599322285&w=2
>
>  net/ipv6/route.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index f5b987d..60d95cd 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -2769,6 +2769,16 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  	cfg->fc_protocol = rtm->rtm_protocol;
>  	cfg->fc_type = rtm->rtm_type;
>
> +	if (rtm->rtm_protocol == RTPROT_RA) {
> +		/* RA-derived route: set flags accordingly. */
> +		cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_ADDRCONF;
> +		if (rtm->rtm_dst_len == 0) {
> +			cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_DEFAULT;
> +		} else {
> +			cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_ROUTEINFO;
> +		}

    {} not needed here and above.

[...]

MBR, Sergei