[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C246CAC1457055469EF09E3A7AC4E11A4A5E4426@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:53:29 +0000
From: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appana.durga.rao@...inx.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri" <punnaia@...inx.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/3] net: phy: Add gmiitorgmii converter support
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the review...
>
> > +static int xgmiitorgmii_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev) {
> > + struct gmii2rgmii *priv = phydev->priv;
> > + u16 val = 0;
> > +
> > + priv->phy_drv->read_status(phydev);
>
> This can return an error, in which case phydev->speed should not be trusted.
Will fix...
>
> I've not thought locking all the way through yet. I don't think you need a lock
> here, but i need to think about it.
Ok...
>
> > +
> > + val = mdiobus_read(phydev->mdio.bus, priv->addr,
> > +XILINX_GMII2RGMII_REG);
>
> You should check for an error here.
>
> > + val &= XILINX_GMII2RGMII_SPEED_MASK;
> > +
> > + if (phydev->speed == SPEED_1000)
> > + val |= BMCR_SPEED1000;
> > + else if (phydev->speed == SPEED_100)
> > + val |= BMCR_SPEED100;
> > + else
> > + val |= BMCR_SPEED10;
>
> What happens if for example the PHY is an aquantia and has negotiated
> SPEED_2500? Some Marvell PHYs can also do odd speeds, like 200Mbps.
> You probably want to return an error, rather than silently have things go wrong.
Will fix...
>
> > +
> > + mdiobus_write(phydev->mdio.bus, priv->addr,
> XILINX_GMII2RGMII_REG,
> > +val);
>
> This can also return an error.
Will fix...
>
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int xgmiitorgmii_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev) {
> > + struct device *dev = &mdiodev->dev;
> > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node, *phy_node;
> > + struct gmii2rgmii *priv;
> > +
> > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!priv)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + phy_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "phy-handle", 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(phy_node)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't parse phy-handle\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->phy_dev = of_phy_find_device(phy_node);
> > + if (!priv->phy_dev) {
> > + dev_info(dev, "Couldn't find phydev\n");
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->addr = mdiodev->addr;
> > + priv->phy_drv = priv->phy_dev->drv;
> > + memcpy(&priv->conv_phy_drv, priv->phy_dev->drv,
> > + sizeof(struct phy_driver));
> > + priv->conv_phy_drv.read_status = xgmiitorgmii_read_status;
> > + priv->phy_dev->priv = priv;
> > + priv->phy_dev->drv = &priv->conv_phy_drv;
>
> So from this point onward, the phy driver depends on the memory allocated by
> this driver. If this driver goes away, freeing its memory, the next call to
> read_status() is going to have a problem.
>
> Also, i think this assignment should take the phy lock, just to be safe.
Ok will fix....
>
> There also needs to be some thought into what happens if the phy driver is
> unloaded. Should this driver take a reference on the phy driver to prevent that?
Ok will increment the reference count of the external phy device...
Regards,
Kedar.
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists