[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471824765-26473-14-git-send-email-rvatsavayi@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 17:12:40 -0700
From: Raghu Vatsavayi <rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Raghu Vatsavayi <rvatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>,
Derek Chickles <derek.chickles@...iumnetworks.com>,
Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...iumnetworks.com>,
Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...iumnetworks.com>,
Raghu Vatsavayi <raghu.vatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next V3 13/18] liquidio: CN23XX IQ access
Adds support for Instruction Queue(IQ) index manipulation
routines through bar1 of cn23xx.
Signed-off-by: Derek Chickles <derek.chickles@...iumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...iumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...iumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghu Vatsavayi <raghu.vatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>
---
.../ethernet/cavium/liquidio/cn23xx_pf_device.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/cn23xx_pf_device.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/cn23xx_pf_device.c
index 335d0eb..c2fc4dc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/cn23xx_pf_device.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/cn23xx_pf_device.c
@@ -910,6 +910,67 @@ static void cn23xx_reinit_regs(struct octeon_device *oct)
}
}
+static void cn23xx_bar1_idx_setup(struct octeon_device *oct, u64 core_addr,
+ u32 idx, int valid)
+{
+ u64 bar1;
+ u64 reg_adr;
+
+ if (!valid) {
+ reg_adr = lio_pci_readq(
+ oct, CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx));
+ WRITE_ONCE(bar1, reg_adr);
+ lio_pci_writeq(oct, (READ_ONCE(bar1) & 0xFFFFFFFEULL),
+ CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx));
+ reg_adr = lio_pci_readq(
+ oct, CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx));
+ WRITE_ONCE(bar1, reg_adr);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* The PEM(0..3)_BAR1_INDEX(0..15)[ADDR_IDX]<23:4> stores
+ * bits <41:22> of the Core Addr
+ */
+ lio_pci_writeq(oct, (((core_addr >> 22) << 4) | PCI_BAR1_MASK),
+ CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx));
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(bar1, lio_pci_readq(
+ oct, CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx)));
+}
+
+static void cn23xx_bar1_idx_write(struct octeon_device *oct, u32 idx, u32 mask)
+{
+ lio_pci_writeq(oct, mask,
+ CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx));
+}
+
+static u32 cn23xx_bar1_idx_read(struct octeon_device *oct, u32 idx)
+{
+ return (u32)lio_pci_readq(
+ oct, CN23XX_PEM_BAR1_INDEX_REG(oct->pcie_port, idx));
+}
+
+/* always call with lock held */
+static u32 cn23xx_update_read_index(struct octeon_instr_queue *iq)
+{
+ u32 new_idx;
+ u32 last_done;
+ u32 pkt_in_done = readl(iq->inst_cnt_reg);
+
+ last_done = pkt_in_done - iq->pkt_in_done;
+ iq->pkt_in_done = pkt_in_done;
+
+ /* Modulo of the new index with the IQ size will give us
+ * the new index. The iq->reset_instr_cnt is always zero for
+ * cn23xx, so no extra adjustments are needed.
+ */
+ new_idx = (iq->octeon_read_index +
+ (u32)(last_done & CN23XX_PKT_IN_DONE_CNT_MASK)) %
+ iq->max_count;
+
+ return new_idx;
+}
+
static void cn23xx_enable_pf_interrupt(struct octeon_device *oct, u8 intr_flag)
{
struct octeon_cn23xx_pf *cn23xx = (struct octeon_cn23xx_pf *)oct->chip;
@@ -1087,6 +1148,11 @@ int setup_cn23xx_octeon_pf_device(struct octeon_device *oct)
oct->fn_list.soft_reset = cn23xx_pf_soft_reset;
oct->fn_list.setup_device_regs = cn23xx_setup_pf_device_regs;
oct->fn_list.reinit_regs = cn23xx_reinit_regs;
+ oct->fn_list.update_iq_read_idx = cn23xx_update_read_index;
+
+ oct->fn_list.bar1_idx_setup = cn23xx_bar1_idx_setup;
+ oct->fn_list.bar1_idx_write = cn23xx_bar1_idx_write;
+ oct->fn_list.bar1_idx_read = cn23xx_bar1_idx_read;
oct->fn_list.enable_interrupt = cn23xx_enable_pf_interrupt;
oct->fn_list.disable_interrupt = cn23xx_disable_pf_interrupt;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists