[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160822160534.6b2afd8f@pixies>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:05:34 +0300
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: ip_finish_output_gso: Attempt gso_size
clamping if segments exceed mtu
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:58:42 +0200, fw@...len.de wrote:
> >
> > Florian, in fe6cc55f you described a BUG due to gso_size decrease.
> > I've tested both bridged and routed cases, but in my setups failed to
> > hit the issue; Appreciate if you can provide some hints.
>
> Still get the BUG, I applied this patch on top of net-next.
>
> On hypervisor:
> 10.0.0.2 via 192.168.7.10 dev tap0 mtu lock 1500
> ssh root@...0.0.2 'cat > /dev/null' < /dev/zero
>
> On vm1 (which dies instantly, see below):
> eth0 mtu 1500 (192.168.7.10)
> eth1 mtu 1280 (10.0.0.1)
>
> On vm2
> eth0 mtu 1280 (10.0.0.2)
>
> Normal ipv4 routing via vm1, no iptables etc. present, so
>
> we have hypervisor 1500 -> 1500 VM1 1280 -> 1280 VM2
>
> Turning off gro avoids this problem.
Thanks Florian, will dive into this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists