[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471977087.14381.32.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:31:27 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsa@...ulusnetworks.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: diag: slightly refactor the
inet_diag_bc_audit error checks.
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 03:06 +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> This simplifies the code a bit and also allows inet_diag_bc_audit
> to send to userspace an error that isn't EINVAL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/inet_diag.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> index 38c2c47..a835f94 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
> @@ -706,10 +706,23 @@ static bool valid_port_comparison(const struct inet_diag_bc_op *op,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static int inet_diag_bc_audit(const void *bytecode, int bytecode_len)
> +static bool valid_markcond(const struct inet_diag_bc_op *op, int len,
> + int *min_len)
> {
> - const void *bc = bytecode;
> - int len = bytecode_len;
> + *min_len += sizeof(struct inet_diag_markcond);
> + return len >= *min_len;
> +}
I do not see how this can compile, since you introduce "struct
inet_diag_markcond" in the following patch ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists