[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160823215916.6fd6a57a@halley>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:59:16 +0300
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/sched: Introduce act_iptunnel
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:21:41 +0300 Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:37:07AM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> >
> > The noun "ip tunnel" is a little misleading. Unless you can use
> > this for other types of tunnels (ipip, etc). If this is specific
> > for just vxlan and metadata setting then some name like vxlanmeta
> > or something else that signifies both metadata de/encap + vxlan would
> > be helpful.
> Yeh, this name is not the best...
> The action is not vxlan specific, it should be good for all the
> ip tunnel interfaces that use metadata for the outer headers.
> I will rename it to something like mdtunnel - unless someone has a
> better suggestion.
Well, in bpf we have BPF_FUNC_skb_set_tunnel_key.
How about "action tunnel_key" as the noun?
Another decent alternative might be "action tunnel_info".
Not sure about the verbs though.. "action tunnel_key set/unset"?
Regards,
Shmulik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists