[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <56a89d7c-3a0b-d270-99c9-1632320c6339@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:01:59 +0200
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To: Hariprasad Shenai <hariprasad@...lsio.com>
Cc: "open list:CXGB4 ETHERNET DRIVER (CXGB4)" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxgb4: fix invalid checks in alloc_uld_rxqs
On 08/23/2016 09:46 AM, Hariprasad Shenai wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 08/23/16, 2016 at 08:16:19 +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Local variable msi_idx defined as unsigned int is always >= 0, thus both
>> 'if' checks are always true. On the other side presence of USING_MSIX flag
>> suggests the checks should not be trivially true.
>> The simplest solution is to replace incorrect checks with direct testing
>> of adap->flags and remove spare variables.
>>
>> The problem has been detected using semantic patch
>> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci
>>
> The correct fix is to have local variable 'msi_idx' as int instead of unsigned
> int. Thanks for reporting the issue. Do you want me to send a V2?
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>
If adap->flags is constant during the call I see no point in creating
separate
variable with complicated initialization used only for the same thing as
'adap->flags & USING_MSIX', and even if adap->flags changes during the call
much simpler would be to use local var:
int using_msix = adap->flags & USING_MSIX;
and later use tests:
if (using_msix)
...
Am I correct?
Regards
Andrzej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists