netdev - Re: [PATCH net] qed: FLR of active VFs might lead to FW assert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160822.181848.1467939282286710395.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] qed: FLR of active VFs might lead to FW assert

From: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:03:29 +0300

> Driver never bothered marking the VF's vport with the VF's sw_fid.
> As a result, FLR flows are not going to clean those vports.
> 
> If the vport was active when FLRed, re-activating it would lead
> to a FW assertion.
> 
> Fixes: dacd88d6f6851 ("qed: IOV l2 functionality")
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>

Applied, thanks.