| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F91A6E0935@lhreml503-mbs>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:25:12 +0000
From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Huwei (Xavier)" <xavier.huwei@...wei.com>,
oulijun <oulijun@...wei.com>,
"Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH for-next 2/2] IB/hns: Add support of ACPI to the
Hisilicon RoCE driver
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon@...nel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 2:59 PM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: dledford@...hat.com; davem@...emloft.net; Huwei (Xavier); oulijun;
> Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen); mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com; linux-
> rdma@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 2/2] IB/hns: Add support of ACPI to the
> Hisilicon RoCE driver
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:44:50AM +0800, Salil Mehta wrote:
> > This patch is meant to add support of ACPI to the Hisilicon RoCE
> > driver.
> >
> > Changes done are primarily meant to detect the type and then either
> > use DT specific or ACPI spcific functions. Where ever possible,
> > this patch tries to make use of Unified Device Property Interface
> > APIs to support both DT and ACPI through single interface.
> >
> > This patch depends upon HNS ethernet driver to Reset RoCE. This
> > function within HNS ethernet driver has also been enhanced to
> > support ACPI and is part of other accompanying patch with this
> > patch-set.
> >
> > NOTE: The changes in this patch are done over below branch,
> > https://github.com/dledford/linux/tree/hns-roce
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > Change Log
> >
> > PATCH V1: Initial version to support ACPI in HNS RoCE driver.
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c | 37 ++++++--
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c | 127
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 5 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> > index 00f01be..ea73580 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> > @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ struct hns_roce_dev {
> > struct ib_device ib_dev;
> > struct platform_device *pdev;
> > struct hns_roce_uar priv_uar;
> > - const char *irq_names;
> > + const char *irq_names[HNS_ROCE_MAX_IRQ_NUM];
> > spinlock_t sm_lock;
> > spinlock_t cq_db_lock;
> > spinlock_t bt_cmd_lock;
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c
> > index 5febbb4..98af7fe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_eq.c
> > @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ int hns_roce_init_eq_table(struct hns_roce_dev
> *hr_dev)
> >
> > for (j = 0; j < eq_num; j++) {
> > ret = request_irq(eq_table->eq[j].irq,
> hns_roce_msi_x_interrupt,
> > - 0, hr_dev->irq_names, eq_table->eq + j);
> > + 0, hr_dev->irq_names[j], eq_table->eq + j);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(dev, "request irq error!\n");
> > goto err_request_irq_fail;
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > index b52f3ba..399f5de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.c
> > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <rdma/ib_umem.h>
> > #include "hns_roce_common.h"
> > #include "hns_roce_device.h"
> > @@ -794,29 +795,47 @@ static void hns_roce_port_enable(struct
> hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, int enable_flag)
> > * @enable: true -- drop reset, false -- reset
> > * return 0 - success , negative --fail
> > */
> > -int hns_roce_v1_reset(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, bool enable)
> > +int hns_roce_v1_reset(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, bool dereset)
> > {
> > struct device_node *dsaf_node;
> > struct device *dev = &hr_dev->pdev->dev;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - dsaf_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "dsaf-handle", 0);
> > - if (!dsaf_node) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Unable to get dsaf node by dsaf-handle!\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > + /* check if this is DT/ACPI case */
> > + if (dev_of_node(dev)) {
> > + dsaf_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "dsaf-handle", 0);
> > + if (!dsaf_node) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "could not find dsaf-handle\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + fwnode = &dsaf_node->fwnode;
> > + } else if (is_acpi_device_node(dev->fwnode)) {
> > + struct acpi_reference_args args;
> > +
> > + ret = acpi_node_get_property_reference(dev->fwnode,
> > + "dsaf-handle", 0, &args);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "could not find dsaf-handle\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(args.adev);
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(dev, "cannot read data from DT or ACPI\n");
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = hns_dsaf_roce_reset(&dsaf_node->fwnode, false);
> > + ret = hns_dsaf_roce_reset(fwnode, false);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - if (enable) {
> > + if (dereset) {
> > msleep(SLEEP_TIME_INTERVAL);
> > - return hns_dsaf_roce_reset(&dsaf_node->fwnode, true);
> > + ret = hns_dsaf_roce_reset(fwnode, true);
> > }
> >
> > - return 0;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > void hns_roce_v1_profile(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.h
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.h
> > index 2b3bf21..316b592 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.h
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v1.h
> > @@ -976,6 +976,6 @@ struct hns_roce_v1_priv {
> > struct hns_roce_raq_table raq_table;
> > };
> >
> > -int hns_dsaf_roce_reset(struct fwnode_handle *dsaf_fwnode, bool
> enable);
> > +int hns_dsaf_roce_reset(struct fwnode_handle *dsaf_fwnode, bool
> dereset);
> >
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> > index 6ead671..f64f0dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> > * CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
> > * SOFTWARE.
> > */
> > -
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > #include <rdma/ib_addr.h>
> > #include <rdma/ib_smi.h>
> > @@ -694,40 +694,122 @@ error_failed_setup_mtu_gids:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id hns_roce_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "hisilicon,hns-roce-v1", .data = &hns_roce_hw_v1,
> },
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, hns_roce_of_match);
> > +
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id hns_roce_acpi_match[] = {
> > + { "HISI00D1", (kernel_ulong_t)&hns_roce_hw_v1 },
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, hns_roce_acpi_match);
> > +
> > +static int hns_roce_node_match(struct device *dev, void *fwnode)
> > +{
> > + return dev->fwnode == fwnode;
> > +}
>
> It looks like this function should return bool and not int.
Hi Leon,
Thanks for reviewing. Yes, I think bool would have been much
better as a return value but if you see the prototype of the
"match" function in bus_find_device(), it returns int:
struct device *bus_find_device(struct bus_type *bus,
struct device *start, void *data,
int (*match)(struct device *dev, void *data))
{
struct klist_iter i;
..........................
..........................
}
I also verified this in few other example code legs where it is being
used, like:
File: platform.c
static int of_dev_node_match(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
return dev->of_node == data;
}
being used in below function
struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
{
struct device *dev;
dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, np, of_dev_node_match);
return dev ? to_platform_device(dev) : NULL;
}
It looks like we should retain the int as a return type or if you have
some other opinion or if I have missed something here please share :)
Best regards
Salil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists