[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160824215303.099d7ce9@halley>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:53:03 +0300
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 2/4] net/dst: Utility functions to build
dst_metadata without supplying an skb
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:27:08 +0300 Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me> wrote:
> Extract _ip_tun_rx_dst() and _ipv6_tun_rx_dst() out of ip_tun_rx_dst()
> and ipv6_tun_rx_dst(), to be used without supplying an skb.
Additional thing.
In subsequent patches the newly introduced '_ip_tun_rx_dst' and
'_ipv6_tun_rx_dst' are used in a non "rx" context (e.g. for constructing
a IP_TUNNEL_INFO_TX in act_tunnel_key), so the names are misleading.
Consider renaming.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists