[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+6hz4ryexSsivvHrstHfevMvJ4bcPTAU6M6VuWXQqorOjUJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:38:23 +0800
From: Feng Gao <gfree.wind@...il.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Philp Prindeville <philipp@...fish-solutions.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: gre: Use the consitent GRE and PPTP struct
instead of the structures defined in netfilter
Hi Pablo,
inline
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:03:46PM +0800, Feng Gao wrote:
>> My email server reports the last same patch email failed to send.
>> So I just sent it again.
>>
>> I am sorry, if anyone receives duplicated ones.
>
> git am v2-1-2-net-next-netfilter-gre-Use-consistent-GRE_-macros-instead-of-ones-defined-by-netfilter..patch
> -s
> Applying: netfilter: gre: Use consistent GRE_* macros instead of ones
> defined by netfilter.
> error: patch failed: include/uapi/linux/if_tunnel.h:36
> error: include/uapi/linux/if_tunnel.h: patch does not apply
>
> It seems your base was missing this patch:
>
> commit ab10dccb11608b96b43b557c12a5ad867723e503
> Author: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
> Date: Tue Aug 9 12:38:24 2016 +0800
>
> rps: Inspect PPTP encapsulated by GRE to get flow hash
>
> Since I cannot see GRE_FLAGS in your patch as context.
Oh, it is possible that the patches are generated based on my local
branch which has this commit locally, not the latest net-next.
Now, I am more familiar with the rules than before.
>
> Please rebase and resubmit, thanks!
Ok, I will resubmit. Sorry for this fault.
Regards
Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists