lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+6hz4ryexSsivvHrstHfevMvJ4bcPTAU6M6VuWXQqorOjUJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:38:23 +0800
From:   Feng Gao <gfree.wind@...il.com>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
        Netfilter Developer Mailing List 
        <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Philp Prindeville <philipp@...fish-solutions.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: gre: Use the consitent GRE and PPTP struct
 instead of the structures defined in netfilter

Hi Pablo,

inline

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:03:46PM +0800, Feng Gao wrote:
>> My email server reports the last same patch email failed to send.
>> So I just sent it again.
>>
>> I am sorry, if anyone receives duplicated ones.
>
> git am v2-1-2-net-next-netfilter-gre-Use-consistent-GRE_-macros-instead-of-ones-defined-by-netfilter..patch
> -s
> Applying: netfilter: gre: Use consistent GRE_* macros instead of ones
> defined by netfilter.
> error: patch failed: include/uapi/linux/if_tunnel.h:36
> error: include/uapi/linux/if_tunnel.h: patch does not apply
>
> It seems your base was missing this patch:
>
> commit ab10dccb11608b96b43b557c12a5ad867723e503
> Author: Gao Feng <fgao@...ai8.com>
> Date:   Tue Aug 9 12:38:24 2016 +0800
>
>     rps: Inspect PPTP encapsulated by GRE to get flow hash
>
> Since I cannot see GRE_FLAGS in your patch as context.

Oh, it is possible that the patches are generated based on my local
branch which has this commit locally, not the latest net-next.
Now, I am more familiar with the rules than before.

>
> Please rebase and resubmit, thanks!

Ok, I will resubmit. Sorry for this fault.

Regards
Feng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ