[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADVnQymHib8x0mhi2St0dZ5WfzxcMCiwxmg-LdAg=33Z+6MMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:24:54 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: add tcp_add_backlog()
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> When TCP operates in lossy environments (between 1 and 10 % packet
> losses), many SACK blocks can be exchanged, and I noticed we could
> drop them on busy senders, if these SACK blocks have to be queued
> into the socket backlog.
>
> While the main cause is the poor performance of RACK/SACK processing,
> we can try to avoid these drops of valuable information that can lead to
> spurious timeouts and retransmits.
>
> Cause of the drops is the skb->truesize overestimation caused by :
>
> - drivers allocating ~2048 (or more) bytes as a fragment to hold an
> Ethernet frame.
>
> - various pskb_may_pull() calls bringing the headers into skb->head
> might have pulled all the frame content, but skb->truesize could
> not be lowered, as the stack has no idea of each fragment truesize.
>
> The backlog drops are also more visible on bidirectional flows, since
> their sk_rmem_alloc can be quite big.
>
> Let's add some room for the backlog, as only the socket owner
> can selectively take action to lower memory needs, like collapsing
> receive queues or partial ofo pruning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/net/tcp.h | 1 +
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 5 +----
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index 25d64f6de69e1f639ed1531bf2d2df3f00fd76a2..5f5f09f6e019682ef29c864d2f43a8f247fcdd9a 100644
Thanks for doing this, and thanks for the detailed answers to Yuchung's e-mail!
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
neal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists