[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b117fac2-c73f-2d42-3843-52f9717224d9@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:35:46 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/1] net_sched: Introduce skbmod action
On 16-08-29 06:38 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Let me see if i can
> try something. Trickery with RCU is not one of my virtues -
> so i may get it wrong but hope you can comment.
Something like attached? Compile tested.
I tried to emulate gact - but greping around I havent
seen sample code which uses rcu_read_un/lock + synchronize_rcu
this way
[so be gentle if i got it wrong ;->]
I am not sure where Cong is going but probably introducing
a rcu head in each policy will allow to swap and free old one
with call_rcu may be a better approach. The cost may come in
slowing down replace operations.
cheers,
jamal
View attachment "skbmod-rcu-maybe" of type "text/plain" (2894 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists