netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] meson: Meson8b and GXBB DWMAC glue driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFBinCCmg-+8mjd0Xc5c7bEWL9_S_4kizs_UMiiW9ATBH_G8iw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:49:28 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, khilman@...libre.com
Cc:     linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, carlo@...one.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
        manabian@...il.com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] meson: Meson8b and GXBB DWMAC glue driver

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:40 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:16:32 +0200
>
>> This adds a DWMAC glue driver for the PRG_ETHERNET registers found in
>> Meson8b and GXBB SoCs. Based on the "old" meson6b-dwmac glue driver
>> the register layout is completely different.
>> Thus I introduced a separate driver.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - fixed unloading the glue driver when built as module. This pulls in a
>>   patch from Joachim Eastwood (thanks) to get our private data structure
>>   (bsp_priv).
>
> This doesn't apply cleanly at all to the net-next tree, so I have
> no idea where you expect these changes to be applied.
OK, maybe Kevin can me help out here as I think the patches should go
to various trees.

I think patches 1, 3 and 4 should go through the net-next tree (as
these touch drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/ and the corresponding
documentation).
Patch 2 should probably go through clk-meson-gxbb / clk-next (just
like the other clk changes we had).
The last patch (patch 5) should probably go through the ARM SoC tree
(just like the other dts changes we had).

@David, Kevin: would this be fine for you?