netdev - Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3567b503-8b3e-5a3f-580a-f99fd28cf77e@hpe.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:47:43 -0700
From:   Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job

With regard to drops, are both of you sure you're using the same socket 
buffer sizes?

In the meantime, is anything interesting happening with TCP_RR or 
TCP_STREAM?

happy benchmarking,

rick jones