[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1472734643.5019.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 05:57:23 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 14:38 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> Correction, on the server-under-test, I'm actually running RHEL7.2
>
>
> > How do I verify/check if I have enabled a cpu-cgroup?
>
> Hannes says I can look in "/proc/self/cgroup"
>
> $ cat /proc/self/cgroup
> 7:net_cls:/
> 6:blkio:/
> 5:devices:/
> 4:perf_event:/
> 3:cpu,cpuacct:/
> 2:cpuset:/
> 1:name=systemd:/user.slice/user-1000.slice/session-c1.scope
>
> And that "/" indicate I've not enabled cgroups, right?
>
In my experience, I found that times displayed by top are often off for
softirq processing.
Before applying my patch, top shows very small amount of cpu time for
udp_rcv and ksoftirqd/0 , while obviously cpu 0 is completely busy.
Make sure to try latest Linus tree, as I did yesterday, because
apparently things are better than a few weeks back.
BTW, even 'perf top' has sometimes problems showing me cycles spent in
softirq. I need to make sure the cpu processing NIC interrupts also
spend cycles in some user space program to get meaningful results.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists