lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160903103520.3E62B62019@smtp.codeaurora.org> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 10:35:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>, Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com> Subject: Re: mwifiex: propagate error if IRQ request fails in mwifiex_sdio_of() Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> wrote: > If request_irq() fails in mwifiex_sdio_probe_of(), only an error message > is printed but the actual error is not propagated to the caller function. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> What's the conclusion with this patch? Should I drop it or take it? (The discussion is available from the patchwork link in the signature.) -- Sent by pwcli https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9288169/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists